# Implementation Plan: Pacifica Multi-Account BTC Wash Trading System **Branch**: `001-ts-pacifica-perp` | **Date**: 2024-12-29 | **Spec**: [link] **Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/001-ts-pacifica-perp/spec.md` ## Execution Flow (/plan command scope) ``` 1. Load feature spec from Input path → If not found: ERROR "No feature spec at {path}" 2. Fill Technical Context (scan for NEEDS CLARIFICATION) → Detect Project Type from file system structure or context (web=frontend+backend, mobile=app+api) → Set Structure Decision based on project type 3. Fill the Constitution Check section based on the content of the constitution document. 4. Evaluate Constitution Check section below → If violations exist: Document in Complexity Tracking → If no justification possible: ERROR "Simplify approach first" → Update Progress Tracking: Initial Constitution Check 5. Execute Phase 0 → research.md → If NEEDS CLARIFICATION remain: ERROR "Resolve unknowns" 6. Execute Phase 1 → contracts, data-model.md, quickstart.md, agent-specific template file (e.g., `CLAUDE.md` for Claude Code, `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for GitHub Copilot, `GEMINI.md` for Gemini CLI, `QWEN.md` for Qwen Code or `AGENTS.md` for opencode). 7. Re-evaluate Constitution Check section → If new violations: Refactor design, return to Phase 1 → Update Progress Tracking: Post-Design Constitution Check 8. Plan Phase 2 → Describe task generation approach (DO NOT create tasks.md) 9. STOP - Ready for /tasks command ``` **IMPORTANT**: The /plan command STOPS at step 7. Phases 2-4 are executed by other commands: - Phase 2: /tasks command creates tasks.md - Phase 3-4: Implementation execution (manual or via tools) ## Summary **Primary Requirement**: Implement a multi-account wash trading system for BTC trading pairs on Pacifica perpetual DEX to generate artificial volume while maintaining position neutrality across multiple accounts. **Technical Approach**: Build a TypeScript-based system with real-time coordination of buy/sell orders across up to 20 accounts, integrated with Pacifica's REST API and WebSocket feeds, featuring comprehensive risk management and audit logging. ## Technical Context **Language/Version**: TypeScript 5.0+ with Node.js 18+ **Primary Dependencies**: Pacifica API client, WebSocket client, crypto libraries for private key management **Storage**: In-memory for active sessions, encrypted local storage for account credentials **Testing**: Jest with contract tests, integration tests, and performance benchmarks **Target Platform**: Node.js server environment with CLI interface **Project Type**: Single (backend service with CLI) **Performance Goals**: <100ms order execution latency, support 20 concurrent accounts, handle 1000+ orders/hour **Constraints**: Must maintain account neutrality, comply with rate limits, secure private key storage **Scale/Scope**: 20 trading accounts, BTC/USD and BTC/ETH pairs, real-time coordination ## Constitution Check *GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.* ### Modular Architecture Compliance - [x] Each component has single, well-defined responsibility (AccountManager, OrderCoordinator, RiskManager) - [x] Clear module boundaries with standardized interfaces (API contracts, event system) - [x] High cohesion within modules, loose coupling between modules (EventEmitter-based communication) - [x] Self-contained, independently deployable components (Modular service architecture) ### Layered Architecture Validation - [x] Clear separation: CLI → Business Logic → Data Access → External APIs - [x] Each layer communicates only with adjacent layers (Strict interface boundaries) - [x] Well-defined interfaces between layers (TypeScript interfaces, event contracts) ### SOLID Principles Verification - [x] Single Responsibility: Each class/module has one reason to change (Account management, order coordination, risk monitoring) - [x] Open/Closed: Open for extension, closed for modification (Strategy pattern for trading strategies) - [x] Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions, not concretions (Interface-based design) ### Integration-First Design - [x] Seamless integration with existing systems prioritized (Pacifica API integration) - [x] Configuration-driven behavior where possible (JSON configuration files) - [x] Minimal disruption to existing workflows (CLI-based control) ### Simplicity Check - [x] No unnecessary abstractions or over-engineering (Direct API integration) - [x] Simpler solution chosen when it meets requirements (In-memory storage for active sessions) - [x] Every design decision justified by business needs (Wash trading requirements) ## Project Structure ### Documentation (this feature) ``` specs/[###-feature]/ ├── plan.md # This file (/plan command output) ├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/plan command) ├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command) ├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command) ├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/plan command) └── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/tasks command - NOT created by /plan) ``` ### Source Code (repository root) ``` src/ ├── models/ │ ├── Account.ts │ ├── WashTradingSession.ts │ ├── OrderPair.ts │ ├── TradingStrategy.ts │ └── RiskMetrics.ts ├── services/ │ ├── PacificaAPIClient.ts │ ├── WebSocketManager.ts │ ├── AccountManager.ts │ ├── OrderCoordinator.ts │ ├── RiskManager.ts │ └── AuditLogger.ts ├── strategies/ │ ├── BaseStrategy.ts │ ├── EqualVolumeStrategy.ts │ ├── TimeBasedStrategy.ts │ └── MarketMakingStrategy.ts ├── cli/ │ ├── commands/ │ │ ├── start-session.ts │ │ ├── stop-session.ts │ │ ├── status.ts │ │ └── configure.ts │ └── dashboard.ts ├── utils/ │ ├── encryption.ts │ ├── validation.ts │ └── logger.ts └── index.ts tests/ ├── contract/ │ ├── pacifica-api.test.ts │ ├── websocket.test.ts │ └── account-manager.test.ts ├── integration/ │ ├── wash-trading-session.test.ts │ ├── multi-account-coordination.test.ts │ └── risk-management.test.ts └── unit/ ├── models/ ├── services/ └── strategies/ config/ ├── accounts.json ├── trading-strategies.json └── risk-limits.json ``` **Structure Decision**: Single project structure with clear separation of concerns. Models define data structures, services handle business logic, strategies implement trading algorithms, CLI provides user interface, and comprehensive test coverage ensures reliability. ## Phase 0: Outline & Research 1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above: - For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task - For each dependency → best practices task - For each integration → patterns task 2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**: ``` For each unknown in Technical Context: Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}" For each technology choice: Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}" ``` 3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format: - Decision: [what was chosen] - Rationale: [why chosen] - Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated] **Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved ## Phase 1: Design & Contracts *Prerequisites: research.md complete* 1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`: - Entity name, fields, relationships - Validation rules from requirements - State transitions if applicable 2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements: - For each user action → endpoint - Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns - Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/` 3. **Generate contract tests** from contracts: - One test file per endpoint - Assert request/response schemas - Tests must fail (no implementation yet) 4. **Extract test scenarios** from user stories: - Each story → integration test scenario - Quickstart test = story validation steps 5. **Update agent file incrementally** (O(1) operation): - Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh cursor` **IMPORTANT**: Execute it exactly as specified above. Do not add or remove any arguments. - If exists: Add only NEW tech from current plan - Preserve manual additions between markers - Update recent changes (keep last 3) - Keep under 150 lines for token efficiency - Output to repository root **Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, failing tests, quickstart.md, agent-specific file ## Phase 2: Task Planning Approach *This section describes what the /tasks command will do - DO NOT execute during /plan* **Task Generation Strategy**: - Load `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as base - Generate tasks from Phase 1 design docs (contracts, data model, quickstart) - Each contract → contract test task [P] - Each entity → model creation task [P] - Each user story → integration test task - Implementation tasks to make tests pass **Specific Task Categories for BTC Wash Trading System**: 1. **Foundation Tasks** (T001-T010): - Project setup and configuration - Core dependencies installation - Environment configuration - Basic TypeScript setup 2. **Data Model Tasks** (T011-T020): - Account model implementation - WashTradingSession model - OrderPair and Order models - TradingStrategy model - RiskMetrics and RiskAlert models - AuditEntry model 3. **Core Service Tasks** (T021-T035): - PacificaAPIClient implementation - WebSocketManager implementation - AccountManager implementation - OrderCoordinator implementation - RiskManager implementation - AuditLogger implementation 4. **Strategy Implementation Tasks** (T036-T045): - BaseStrategy abstract class - EqualVolumeStrategy implementation - TimeBasedStrategy implementation - MarketMakingStrategy implementation - Strategy configuration system 5. **API Implementation Tasks** (T046-T060): - REST API endpoints implementation - WebSocket event handling - Authentication and authorization - Rate limiting implementation - Error handling and validation 6. **CLI Interface Tasks** (T061-T070): - CLI command implementations - Dashboard interface - Configuration management - Status monitoring commands 7. **Testing Tasks** (T071-T085): - Unit tests for all models - Service layer tests - API contract tests - Integration tests - Performance benchmarks 8. **Integration and Deployment Tasks** (T086-T095): - Pacifica API integration - WebSocket connection management - Multi-account coordination testing - Risk management validation - Production deployment setup **Ordering Strategy**: - TDD order: Tests before implementation - Dependency order: Models before services before API before CLI - Mark [P] for parallel execution (independent files) - BTC-specific focus: Prioritize BTC/USD and BTC/ETH pair support **Estimated Output**: 95+ numbered, ordered tasks in tasks.md **IMPORTANT**: This phase is executed by the /tasks command, NOT by /plan ## Phase 3+: Future Implementation *These phases are beyond the scope of the /plan command* **Phase 3**: Task execution (/tasks command creates tasks.md) **Phase 4**: Implementation (execute tasks.md following constitutional principles) **Phase 5**: Validation (run tests, execute quickstart.md, performance validation) ## Complexity Tracking *Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified* | Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because | |-----------|------------|-------------------------------------| | [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] | | [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] | ## Progress Tracking *This checklist is updated during execution flow* **Phase Status**: - [x] Phase 0: Research complete (/plan command) - [x] Phase 1: Design complete (/plan command) - [ ] Phase 2: Task planning complete (/plan command - describe approach only) - [ ] Phase 3: Tasks generated (/tasks command) - [ ] Phase 4: Implementation complete - [ ] Phase 5: Validation passed **Gate Status**: - [x] Initial Constitution Check: PASS - [x] Post-Design Constitution Check: PASS - [x] All NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved - [x] Complexity deviations documented --- *Based on Constitution v1.1.0 - See `/memory/constitution.md`*